But she says, he gotta do the other part 1st.” (BPC: he’s gotta do) Control participant: “it has my size” (BPC: it truly is 
my size)Brain Sci. 2013, three Table five. Cont.Main Violations of Correlative Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “I … she wants the residence painted precisely the same as him and he wants to mow the lawn.” (BPC 1: as he does; or BPC two: as his house) H.M.: “Yes. Because it’s wrong for her to become and he’s dressed just as this that he’s dressed along with the same way–(Exp.: OK, good) as her.” (BPC: he’s dressed just as this man is dressed) H.M.: “Once has to be trash in yellow (inaudible) … is just not here. (H.M. misread the target word nor as not) (Exp.: It says nor) She does not want her pie.” [H.M. failed to use nor as requested] H.M.: “I want a number of that pie either some pie and I will have some.” (misuse of either) H.M.: “Any pie to either have.” (misuse of either) H.M.: “Any pie that either she either had.” (two misuses of either)BPCs are in parentheses, with numbers labeling alternative BPCs and several errors. Square brackets enclose an explanation for typical examples in every single category.four.two.two. Precise Analyses: Gender, Quantity, and Individual CCs As applied towards the TLC, gender, number, and particular person CCs refer towards the truth that (a) suitable names, pronouns, prevalent nouns, and widespread noun NPs must agree in gender, quantity, and person with their referents within a image, and (b) pronouns ought to agree in gender, number, and particular person with their antecedents within a sentence. four.2.two.1. Gender, Quantity, and Individual CCs for Correct Name Referents H.M. developed seven correct names versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls, a trusted 6.0 SD distinction by convention. For these seven appropriate name utilizes, H.M. violated 0 referent-proper name CCs involving gender, versus a mean of 0.0 for the MS023 biological activity controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0). One example is, inside the corresponding TLC images, H.M.’s proper names Gary and David in (23ab) referred to males, and Melanie in (23c) referred to a female. (23a). H.M.: “Gary is … PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338877 almos … pretty much … hasn’t been cut the exact same way.” (Gary is an invented appropriate name that specifies an unknown man within the TLC image) (23b). H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to find out what lady’s applying to pull himself up in addition to his hands.” (David is an invented appropriate name that specifies an unknown man inside the TLC image) (23c). H.M.: “Melanie gets on that one if she can and she desires her to travel in conjunction with him.” (Melanie is an invented suitable name that specifies an unknown lady in the TLC image) Analyses of referent-proper name CCs for person and number replicated and extended these gender CC results: H.M. produced 0 violations of referent-proper name CCs for particular person (with N = 7), versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0), and 0 violations of referent-proper name CCs for quantity (with N = 7), versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0).Brain Sci. 2013, three four.2.2.2. Gender, Quantity, and Individual CCs for Pronouns and Prevalent NounsH.M. violated 22 individual, number, and gender CCs involving pronouns and popular nouns, versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls (SD = 0), a dependable six.0 SD difference by convention. Of these, 14 had been violations of gender CCs, as in (24). (24). H.M.: “…to view what lady’s using to pull himself up apart from his hands.” (BPC: to find out what this lady’s utilizing to pull herself up in addition to her hands; see Table five for H.M.’s complete utterance) (25). H.M.: “If they do not use legs like he does…and his hands…” (BPC: If they don’t use their legs like.