But she says, he gotta do the other component very first.” (BPC: he’s gotta do) Handle participant: “it has my size” (BPC: it can be my size)Brain Sci. 2013, 3 Table 5. Cont.Main Violations of Correlative Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “I … she desires the home painted the same as him and he wants to mow the lawn.” (BPC 1: as he does; or BPC two: as his house) H.M.: “Yes. Since it is wrong for her to be and he’s dressed just as this that he’s dressed plus the similar way–(Exp.: OK, superior) as her.” (BPC: he’s dressed just as this man is dressed) H.M.: “Once has to be trash in yellow (inaudible) … is just not right here. (H.M. misread the target word nor as not) (Exp.: It says nor) She does not want her pie.” [H.M. failed to make use of nor as requested] H.M.: “I want a number of that pie either some pie and I will have some.” (misuse of either) H.M.: “Any pie to either have.” (misuse of either) H.M.: “Any pie that either she either had.” (two misuses of either)BPCs are in parentheses, with numbers labeling option BPCs and various errors. Square brackets enclose an explanation for standard examples in every single category.4.two.2. Specific Analyses: Gender, Number, and Particular person CCs As applied to the TLC, gender, number, and particular person CCs refer to the reality that (a) proper names, pronouns, common nouns, and prevalent noun NPs have to agree in gender, number, and individual with their referents within a image, and (b) pronouns have to agree in gender, quantity, and particular person with their antecedents within a sentence. 4.2.two.1. Gender, Quantity, and Person CCs for Proper Name Referents H.M. made seven proper names versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls, a reputable six.0 SD distinction by convention. For these seven right name uses, H.M. violated 0 referent-proper name CCs involving gender, versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0). As an example, inside the corresponding TLC photographs, H.M.’s right names Gary and David in (23ab) referred to males, and Melanie in (23c) referred to a female. (23a). H.M.: “Gary is … PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338877 almos … virtually … hasn’t been reduce the same way.” (Gary is an invented suitable name that specifies an unknown man inside the TLC picture) (23b). H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to see what lady’s utilizing to pull himself up besides his hands.” (David is an invented Vesnarinone correct name that specifies an unknown man in the TLC image) (23c). H.M.: “Melanie gets on that one if she can and she desires her to 
travel in conjunction with him.” (Melanie is definitely an invented proper name that specifies an unknown woman in the TLC picture) Analyses of referent-proper name CCs for individual and quantity replicated and extended these gender CC benefits: H.M. created 0 violations of referent-proper name CCs for person (with N = 7), versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0), and 0 violations of referent-proper name CCs for quantity (with N = 7), versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0).Brain Sci. 2013, 3 4.two.2.2. Gender, Number, and Particular person CCs for Pronouns and Frequent NounsH.M. violated 22 particular person, quantity, and gender CCs involving pronouns and typical nouns, versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls (SD = 0), a dependable 6.0 SD difference by convention. Of those, 14 were violations of gender CCs, as in (24). (24). H.M.: “…to determine what lady’s utilizing to pull himself up in addition to his hands.” (BPC: to determine what this lady’s applying to pull herself up in addition to her hands; see Table five for H.M.’s full utterance) (25). H.M.: “If they do not use legs like he does…and his hands…” (BPC: If they do not use their legs like.