Uitination by the E2-E3 enzyme cascade,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5443, pp. 1321326, 1999. [6] J. M. Huibregtse, M. Scheffner, S. Beaudenon, and P. M. Howley, “A loved ones of proteins structurally and functionally associated for the E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase,” Proceedings with the National Academy of Sciences of the United states of america of America, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 2563567, 1995. [7] M. D. Petroski and R. J. Deshaies, “Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases,” Nature Critiques Molecular Cell Biology, vol. six, no. 1, pp. 90, 2005. [8] M. Hochstrasser, “αLβ2 Antagonist MedChemExpress Lingering mysteries of ubiquitin-chain assembly,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 274, 2006. [9] J. S. Thrower, L. Hoffman, M. Rechsteiner, and C. M. Pickart, “Recognition of your polyubiquitin proteolytic signal,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 9402, 2000. [10] O. Coux, K. Tanaka, and also a. L. Goldberg, “Structure and functions from the 20S and 26S proteasomes,” Annual Overview of Biochemistry, vol. 65, pp. 80147, 1996. [11] W. Baumeister, J. Walz, F. Zhl, and E. Seemller, “The prou u teasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease,” Cell, vol. 92, no. three, pp. 36780, 1998. [12] S. Murata, H. Yashiroda, and K. Tanaka, “Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly,” Nature Critiques Molecular Cell Biology, vol. ten, no. two, pp. 10415, 2009. [13] C. Behrends and J. W. Harper, “Constructing and decoding unconventional ubiquitin chains,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 52028, 2011. [14] R. L. Welchman, C. Gordon, and R. J. Mayer, “Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals,” Nature PARP1 Inhibitor custom synthesis Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 59909, 2005. [15] E. Walinda, D. Morimoto, K. Sugase, T. Konuma, H. Tochio, and M. Shirakawa, “Solution atructure from the ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain of human autophagy receptor NBR1 and its interaction with ubiquitin and polyubiquitin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 20, pp. 138903902, 2014. [16] M. Hochstrasser, “Origin and function of ubiquitin-like proteins,” Nature, vol. 458, no. 7237, pp. 42229, 2009. [17] N. Mulakkal, P. Nagy, S. Tak s, R. Tusco, G. Juh z, and I. a a P. Nezis, “Autophagy in Drosophila: from historical studies to current know-how,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Write-up ID 273473, 24 pages, 2014. [18] N. Mizushima, T. Yoshimori, and Y. Ohsumi, “The part of atg proteins in autophagosome formation,” Annual Critique of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 27, pp. 10732, 2011. [19] B. Erdi, P. Nagy, A. Zvara et al., “Loss of the starvationinduced gene Rack1 leads to glycogen deficiency and impaired autophagic responses in Drosophila,” Autophagy, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1124135, 2012. [20] J. Kim, M. Kundu, B. Viollet, and K.-L. Guan, “AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. two, pp. 13241, 2011. [21] D. J. Klionsky and B. A. Schulman, “Dynamic regulation of macroautophagy by distinctive ubiquitin-like proteins,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 21, no. four, pp. 33645, 2014.six. Conclusions(i) Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubl) share functional similarity. The distinct Ubls are activated and conjugated to substrates by similar biochemical mechanisms. (ii) Ubiquitinylation is frequently required for substrate recognition and renders selectivity to autophagy in eukaryotes. (iii) The connection between ubiquitinylation and autophagy is provided by autophagic adaptor proteins (or autophagy recep.