five,high-angle grain boundary (LAGB)with angles 15are angles two 15 and high-angle grain
5,high-angle grain boundary (LAGB)with angles 15are angles two 15 and high-angle grain boundary (HAGB) (HAGB) with misorientation drawn in green and black, respectively. Within this study, the with angles size are also measured according to the HAGB, and Within this in Table five. typical grain15 was drawn in green and black, respectively. is listedstudy, the typical grain size was also measured according to the HAGB, and is listed in Table 5.Metals 2021, 11, x 1839 PEER Overview Metals 2021, 11, FOR7 ofof 16 7Figure 5. Grain boundary (GB) map ofof the base metal and HAZ: (a) base metal, (b) 5 mm from F.L., (c) two mm from F.L., Figure 5. Grain boundary (GB) map the base metal and HAZ: (a) base metal, (b) five mm from F.L., (c) 2 mm from F.L., (d) F.L. of best; (e) base metal, (f) five five mm from F.L., (g) two mm from F.L., (h) F.L. of middle; (i) base metal, (j) 5 mm from F.L., (d) F.L. of top rated; (e) base metal, (f) mm from F.L., (g) two mm from F.L., (h) F.L. of middle; (i) base metal, (j) 5 mm from F.L., (k) 22 mm fromF.L., (l) F.L. of bottom. (k) mm from F.L., (l) F.L. of bottom.The grain sizes of Tb and Bb had been measured as 12.5 10.3 m and 11.8 9.2 m, Table five. Microstructure area fraction and average grain size of base metal and HAZ. respectively, whilst that of Mb was measured as 15.five 12.6 m. This grain size distribution was as a result of TMCP procedure by which fine crystal grains had been (-)-Irofulven Purity formed at the surface (Tb, Microstructure Region Fraction Average Grain Size Bb)Specimen large reduction price in addition to a speedy cooling price, though coarse grains had been formed on account of a PF GB AF BF within the central component as a result of a slow cooling rate. Alternatively, the grain size became Tb 11.eight 54.0 34.two 12.five 10.three smaller as the distance in the fusion line enhanced. For example, the grain sizes of T0, T5 70.0 15.7 14.three five.2 2.four T2 andT2 have been measured as 13.five 11.8 m, 12.two 6.7 m, and 5.two two.412.two espectively. T5 m, six.7 eight.6 32.eight ten.9 47.7 B0, B2 T0 B5 have been measured22.1be 17.8 17.3 m, 16.9 ten.two m, and 5.7 2.5 m, reand to 4.five 32.8 40.7 13.5 11.8 spectively. M0, M2 and M5 had been measured to become 20.7 19.four m, 12.5 7.912.6and 4.7 Mb 27.six 59.5 12.8 15.five m, 2.3 m. From the grain size GNE-371 Purity & Documentation mapping results, it is noteworthy that M0 specimens had clear M5 59.3 7.0 33.7 four.7 two.three bi-modal grain size7.four distribution bordering six.eight the fusion line. Additionally, M57.9 smaller on M2 20.0 65.8 12.5 has 20.five 40.0 35.0 20.7 19.four grains M0 T5 and4.five because the central part experienced a quicker cooling rate than the than B5 surface [10,21]. Bb 16.0 52.8 31.3 11.8 9.two B5 69.9 16.6 Quantitative phase volume analysis13.five performed by applying five.7 2.5 was grain orientation eight.8 37.1 12.four 41.7 16.9 10.two spreadB2 (GOS) mapping [224]. GOS mapping is usually a approach of quantitatively measuring B0 33.7 24.1 36.2 17.8 between every the microstructure 6.0 each and every grain by calculating the average misorientation17.3 of point within the grain. GOS analysis classifies the microstructure by matching the structure shape,The grain sizes of Tb and Bb have been measured as 12.5 he PF was classified9.2 , grain orientation, and LAGB within the grains [25,26]. ten.three and 11.8 into a structure withwhile that of Mb was measured as 15.5 12.six . dislocation density inside respectively, a misorientation worth of about 2or less, a low This grain size distribution the grain, towards the TMCPhave anyby which fine crystal grains wereBF have atmisorientation was due and didn’t course of action secondary phase [6,10]. GB and formed a the surface (Tb, differenceto a3or additional [26,27]. The GB and B.