E 10a); (b) Crack Figure mm on Hairline crack of width 10d). of width 315. (a) the 2nd floor wall (ID 52 in Figure1 mm in the crown of an arch (IDin Figure 10a); (b) Crackof width three mm on the 2nd floor wall (ID 52 in Figure 10d).five. Discussion and Conclusions Assessing the seismic danger of a single building or developing aggregate derives in the 5. Discussion and Conclusions convolution of three major parameters that ought to be evaluated: seismic hazard (possibilAssessing the seismic risk of a single developing or constructing aggregate derives in the ity of future seismic shaking), seismic vulnerability (weakness in the structure/s in respect convolution of 3 most important parameters that must be evaluated: seismic hazard (possibility to seismic shaking) and exposure (the element/s of interest at threat). Given that Trakosan Castle was chosen as a case study building within this paper, it ought to be talked about that its seismic structure/s in respect of future seismic shaking), seismic vulnerability (weakness from the hazard and vulnerability is going to be further evaluated in detail inside the frame of ongoing Croato seismic shaking) and exposure (the element/s of interest at danger). Considering that Trakosan c tian Science Foundation Investigation Project (IP-2020-02-3531): Seismic threat assessment of Castle was chosen as a case study building in seismic hazard evaluation this paper, it really should be pointed out that cultural heritage buildings in Bis(7)-tacrine site Croatia (SeisRICHerCRO). Detailed are going to be performed such as probabilistic and scenario-basedfurtheras well because the de- detail inside the frame of its seismic hazard and vulnerability will likely be evaluation evaluated in termination of regional site response. Additional substantial 3D non-linear static analysis is foreongoing Croatian Science Foundation Study Project (IP-2020-02-3531): Seismic danger noticed to be able to properly evaluate the international seismic vulnerability with the developing, i.e., its assessment of cultural heritage buildings in Croatia (SeisRICHerCRO). Detailed seismic structural overall performance. This evaluation will likely be steps/analyses that had been taken towards assessing the hazardpaper presents initial performed such as probabilistic and scenario-based evaluation as building’s seismic vulnerability. As a preliminary and initial step, detailed know-how on properly because the determination of nearby web-site response. Additional in depth 3D non-linear static the building’s geometry was acquired by means of the readily available technical documentation and many on-site visits. Further steps foreseen in geometry identification via the described Croatian Science Foundation Investigation Project will probably be a 3D-laser-scanner survey, which, as well as the technical documentation, will provide maximum precise information regarding the complex creating geometry. Despite the fact that CP-31398 Description totally restored and conserved lastly in 2000, Trakosan Castle was struckGeosciences 2021, 11,14 ofanalysis is foreseen as a way to properly evaluate the worldwide seismic vulnerability on the building, i.e., its structural functionality. This paper presents initial steps/analyses that have been taken towards assessing the building’s seismic vulnerability. As a preliminary and first step, detailed knowledge on the building’s geometry was acquired by means of the offered technical documentation and quite a few on-site visits. Further steps foreseen in geometry identification by means of the talked about Croatian Science Foundation Investigation Project will be a 3D-laser-scanner survey, which, as well as the technical documentation, will deliver maximum precise inf.