S inside the TLC transcripts were normally significant (uncorrected and ungrammatical) and never ever minor (corrected and consistent with the syntactic class regularity). The imply variety of significant CC violations was two.22 per response for H.M. versus 0.13 for the controls (SD = 0.20), a trusted 10.43 SD difference. four.2.1.two. Key Omission-Type CC Violations Table 4 offers a total list of important omission-type CC violations for H.M. and also the controls in Study two, classified by the syntactic category in the units involved. H.M. developed 0.50 omission-type CC violations per response, versus a mean of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.ten), a trusted four.90 SD difference. four.2.1.3. Significant Commission-Type CC Violations Table 5 offers a total list of big commission-type CC violations for H.M. and the controls, classified by syntactic category from the units involved. H.M. created 1.35 commission-type CC violations per response versus a mean of 0.01 for the controls (SD = 0.04), a trusted 33.50 SD deficit.Brain Sci. 2013, three Table 4. Main omission-type violations of conjunction constraints (CCs) involving determiners, nouns, noun phrases (NPs), and verb modifiers in Study 2 organized by type of constraint.Key Violations of Determiner-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Is it crowded and it just pointed out this bus is up right here and it is crowded school bus.” (BPC: a crowded school bus) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a to the NP a crowded college bus] H.M.: “If they don’t use legs like he does … and his hands, they could fall.” (determiner BPC: use their legs) [H.M. failed to conjoin the pronominal determiner their for the NP their legs] H.M.: “it’s on popular street…” (determiner BPC: on a common street) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner a towards the NP a popular street] H.M.: “Well he’s placing the price of it and price tag of thing what it is actually…” (determiner BPC: and also the price tag of X (this) point) [H.M. failed to conjoin the determiner the towards the NP the price] H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to see what lady’s applying to pull himself up besides his hands.” (determiner BPC: to see what this lady’s applying) [H.M. failed to conjoin the demonstrative determiner this to the NP this lady] Manage participant: “Salesman’s Liquiritin custom synthesis talking to…” (BPC: a or the salesman’s talking to) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner for the NP a or the salesman] H.M.: “I want a number of that pie either some pie and I’ll have some.” (BPC: and I will have some X (cake)) [H.M. failed to conjoin the noun cake for the determiner some in the NP some cake] Handle participant: “Woman’s telling the baker…” PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338362 (BPC: a or this woman’s telling…) [This participant failed to conjoin a determiner to the NP a or the woman] Big Violations of Verb-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Well you–she wants 1 thing and he wants a further factor and also the fresh are not–are not. Does not say that, it says not.” (BPC: the fresh fruit usually are not) H.M.: “He had this 
(inaudible) … no, she’s taking that suit and he desires to take it … and he’s attempting to sell.” (BPC: attempting to sell it or that suit) [H.M. failed to conjoin an object to a VP for instance sell it or sell that suit] Control participant: “This person is displaying the lady who’s gonna sit.” (BPC: this individual is displaying the sign to the lady who’s gonna sit) [This participant failed to conjoin an object for the VP is showing and also a preposition towards the lady] Main Violations of Preposition-NP Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “Before initially you cross across.” (BPC: you.